To that end, most Stacker stories are freely available to Stacker believes in making the world’s data more accessible through You may also like: Inside the chaotic, highly lucrative world of influencer marketing today The people on this list use the personal pronouns she/her, as of June 2022. Please note: The data source presumed a binary gender classification. It doesn’t take into account whether inherited wealth or privilege helped in the creation of independent wealth. “Self-made'' in this context means wealth that was not inherited. When this wasn’t possible, a 50/50 split was assumed. ![]() If an individual's shares are held jointly-say, with their husband-individual shareholdings were broken out where possible. And perhaps depressing to note that the combined net worth of everyone on this list is $16.3 billion, or around 11% of Jeff Bezos' net worth. It is interesting to note that San Francisco is the city with the most self-made billionaire women (4), while Los Angeles is in second place (3). Stacker collected data from Hurun Research Institute’s March 2022 report on the world’s self-made women billionaires. There are more self-made women millionaires and billionaires today than ever before, despite an uncontrolled gender wage gap that in 2022 is $0.82 for every $1 a man makes. No cash balance or cash flow is included in the calculation.After several decades of major strides in the American workforce, the number of women in positions of leadership or running their own companies has exploded. Please note all regulatory considerations regarding the presentation of fees must be taken into account. Backtested results are adjusted to reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other income and, except where otherwise indicated, are presented gross-of fees and do not include the effect of backtested transaction costs, management fees, performance fees or expenses, if applicable. Actual performance may differ significantly from backtested performance. Further, backtesting allows the security selection methodology to be adjusted until past returns are maximized. Since trades have not actually been executed, results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity, and may not reflect the impact that certain economic or market factors may have had on the decision-making process. Specifically, backtested results do not reflect actual trading or the effect of material economic and market factors on the decision-making process. Backtested performance is developed with the benefit of hindsight and has inherent limitations. ![]() This information is provided for illustrative purposes only. No representations and warranties are made as to the reasonableness of the assumptions. Certain assumptions have been made for modeling purposes and are unlikely to be realized. Changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on the backtested returns presented. General assumptions include: XYZ firm would have been able to purchase the securities recommended by the model and the markets were sufficiently liquid to permit all trading. ![]() Backtested results are calculated by the retroactive application of a model constructed on the basis of historical data and based on assumptions integral to the model which may or may not be testable and are subject to losses. The results reflect performance of a strategy not historically offered to investors and does not represent returns that any investor actually attained. Backtested performance is not an indicator of future actual results. Disclaimer: The TipRanks Smart Score performance is based on backtested results.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |